Friday, September 24, 2010

Orders: Follow with Caution

After viewing Standard Operating Procedure and reading the interviews of Errol Morris, I found my mind as well as my moral compass significantly boggled. We mentioned in class the struggle between what one feels is morally correct versus what an authority figure is telling that individual to do. Many of those interviewed in Morris's film talked about how they were "just following orders", even though they were aware of the inappropriate nature of their behavior at the time. Some, like Sabrina, said they were taking the photos in Abu Ghraib to, in the future, indict those committing the crimes. However, I feel that these individuals should have possessed a higher level of self-awareness which would have prevented them from taking the photos if not committing the acts of abuse in the first place. Then again, these individuals were soldiers and were usually taking direction from superiors. As a soldier in the U.S. Military, one is indeed taught to follow orders and effectively trained to obey all orders of their superiors. It is my feeling, though, that if one was disturbed by the uncouth procedures, one would at least think to question the authority figure.

Philip Agre - author of Surveillance and Capture: Two Models of Privacy

After reading Philip Agre's essay Surveillance and Capture, I think it would be interesting to hear Agre's opinion on modern technology and surveillance methods. Philip Agre published his essay in 1994 and since that time, technology with surveillance capabilities have become more common and more integral to our society and how it functions. Agre mentions the invasive nature of tracking labels on postage and other trivial things that we, now, take for granted or as commonplace. It seems that in today's world versus 1994, our lives are saturated with technology and these "tracking devices" we no longer bat an eyelash at the thought of having our activities observed. Due to this almost constant presence of an observing force, some people alter their behavior. This is most present, in my mind, in the social situations of adolescents and minors. Many underage people drink, yet are careful of hiding photographic evidence by cropping or editing photos from weekends. Those who aren't cautious occasionally get caught and suffer the consequences. This is a much more colloquial situation as compared to the soldiers at Abu Ghraib, but is another example of the level of self-awareness that is necessary in today's society.

I would be intrigued to see Agre's reaction to the Abu Ghraib photo scandal. I look at it as a panopticon example. Effectively  in this case, the guard incites a behavior and then punishes it. Conversely, the prisoner does what is considered wrong merely because the guard instructs it.

6 comments:

  1. I totally agree with you about that those soldiers should raise their self-awareness.Personally I think the rulls of the millitary are designed to erase people's self-awareness so that everybody follows the orders. This is really ironic because this is what makes soldiers monsters, just think about the Nazi in World War II, the soldiers slaughtered millions of Jewish people, yet their excuses were that they were following orders.

    About the modern surveilance, your article reminded me of some of my friends, every time we were about to take pictures in a party, they were always asking people to wait for them to put down their drink because they don't want their parents see them drinking on facebook. Which can also associates to the self-awareness issue.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If I were the soldier, I will do the following.
    1.) don't do anything beyond the SOP
    2.) if I did, don't take a picture (your point)
    3.) if the picture was taken, don't pose for it
    4.) if all else failed, just come out and admit it, don't find a shallow excuse.
    So to sum it all up, I totally agree with you that self-aware is now needed more than ever. In thai-language, we have a proverb that says "walls have ears and doors have eyes" (it sounds better in Thai). That means, whatever we do, other people will come to know about it eventually.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree, it would be very interesting to see Agre's view on the whole Abu Ghraib situation. Since technology advanced so much since his writing of "Surveillance and Capture", the author's updated and current views would be interesting to hear. The soldiers at the prison did not seem aware enough of the amount of surveillance they were experiencing by their own cameras, just as you said young people today do not think enough about when they are being watched. Perhaps we all need to partake in careful consideration of what we put out publicly into the world, and how others might use and see it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's always like that. When war occurs, when people lose their senses and get brain washed, they can do some things that people will never imagine doing otherwise, like that "nice guy." If he was truly "nice", why did he accept to click the shutter to take pictures of tortures beyond S.O.P.? That is clearly not being nice in normal people's senses. So people end up being monsters. They lose their humanity. But that's no excuse. They were wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I like how you made the comparison between young members of Facebook and the American soldiers: they both need self-awareness! It is true that sometimes, people tend to become extremely obnoxious and inquisitive towards other people's lives, which results in their immoral invasion of privacy. The American soldiers crossed the limits of violating the prisoners' privacy, thus consequently reflecting their punishment. Similarly, many young children who spy on others or disclose their own information on Facebook/ Twitter also face the same consequences (like the example article you mentioned). Evidently, neither the practice of surveillance nor being a victim of it, is enjoyable because it only ends up as calamity.

    ReplyDelete