His mail art is what eventually allowed people to network together to try to make sense of his life. He also did highly impressive collage portraits using silhouettes as well as his performances pieces called (in obvious mockery of Kaprow) "nothings." Overall his pieces were really done for himself rather than for his friends or audiences.
Ray's personality of disregard for his audience is in distinct opposition to a speaker I recently heard, Mary Jane Jacob. Her work, from curatorial to public to philanthropic, is strictly about the audience. Her process for creating begins not with WHAT she wants to create, but WHY she is creating something. She then moves on to find other artists who she can collaborate with to make her work happen, plans the work, and then executes it. Her supreme ability to tap into what a community desires and values in terms of public art has really and truly made all the difference when it comes to her success.
I really like your analogy of Ray Johnson. It actually helps me even after seeing the film and talking with Steven at the WC Gallery understand his work more. I also think the point you brought up about how Ray Johnson does his art more for him then for the people versus Mary Jane Jacob curating art that is for the people. I wonder, do you think Ray Johnson would have anything to say about how Jacob goes about her "process". hehe.
ReplyDeleteBoth Jacob and Johnson more or less wait and let things happen and include process as part of what they do. How they present themselves is quite different with Johnson being a recluse and Jacob working in public and within the education system.
ReplyDelete